Zaboud

The name Zaboud has its roots in ancient Semitic languages, derived potentially from a Hebrew or Aramaic origin. While the exact etymology is unclear, it may be linked to words denoting 'gift' or 'endowment,' reflecting a sense of divine favor or blessing. Names with similar phonetic structures often carry connotations of service or dedication in biblical contexts. Historically, Zaboud appears in the genealogical records of the Old Testament, suggesting its use as a personal name among Israelite families.

Interestingly, Zaboud is noted for its presence in the Greek Septuagint (Rahlfs), rather than the Masoretic Text, which highlights its textual variation and historical transmission. Such differences underscore the diversity in biblical manuscripts and the ways names were preserved across traditions.

Zaboud holds a unique place in biblical records as the son of Hammuel and the father of Zaccur, as mentioned in 1 Chronicles 4:26. This genealogical placement situates him within the tribe of Judah, a lineage renowned for its connection to King David and ultimately to Jesus Christ. The name's Divine Proximity Index of 70.3/100 indicates a moderate association with God, reflecting its appearance in a sacred lineage without direct divine encounters or roles.

The Jesus Circle Score of 94.1/100 is particularly intriguing, as it suggests a strong symbolic or theological connection to the messianic lineage. While Zaboud is not explicitly linked to Jesus in the New Testament, his inclusion in the genealogical framework of Judah ties him indirectly to the broader redemptive narrative. This underscores how even lesser-known figures like Zaboud contribute to the unfolding story of salvation.

Zaboud is mentioned in 1 Chronicles 4:26, nestled within a genealogical list that traces the descendants of Judah. Such genealogies serve not only as historical records but also as theological affirmations of God's covenantal promises to His people. Though Zaboud's role is not elaborated upon, his presence highlights the importance of every individual in the divine narrative.

The fact that Zaboud's name appears in the Septuagint but not in the Masoretic Text points to the complexities of biblical textual transmission. This discrepancy invites deeper exploration into how names and genealogies were preserved, translated, and interpreted across different scriptural traditions. For those studying the Bible, Zaboud's inclusion in one textual tradition but not another serves as a reminder of the rich, layered history of God's Word.